![]() We are working on that, at least trying :) v1.1. Nzbget is way ahead in terms of performance, if you have a 300Mbit line or an underpowered device, nzbget is the way to go. SABnzbd is compatible with Synology and QNAP NAS devices but isn’t as lightweight as NZBGet. ![]() That makes it a better solution for Raspberry PI and NAS devices. This gives NZBGet the advantage of using fewer system resources which ultimately makes it faster. ![]() Sabnzbd might be older, but nzbget is also already quite a few years in its current complete form! SABnzbd uses Python while NZBGet is coded in C++. The download statistics basically make clear that it seems the rest of the internet doesn't agree: Sabnzbd averages a steady 2000 downloads a day (current stable v1.0.3), Nzbget 350 a day (v16.4 up to release day of v17). Perhaps the best thing about NZBGet is that it's in active development, while SABnzbd is currently in maintenance mode. It provides its users with a slick interface that SABnzbd simply does not have. SABnzbd is compatible with Synology and QNAP NAS devices but isn't as lightweight as NZBGet. I appreciate that /u/randomelixirdevdude at least wrote that it's his personal choice -) Hard not to write an angry response when he gives "my" interface (I wrote 99% of the new Wizzard, Glitter and Config) a D. NZBGet, while clearly inspired by the design of SABnzbd, has built on the rich tradition of open source NZB downloaders. SABnzbd uses Python while NZBGet is coded in C++.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |